Episode Summary
In 1843 Daniel M’naghten gunned down another man in broad daylight. But when he was taken to trial things got complicated. His defense argued that he shouldn’t be held fully responsible because he wasn’t in his right mind. However, the courts didn’t know what to do with that because there was no precedent for this kind of thing. So his defense team got to work putting in place a defense strategy that is still used, almost in the exact same way, almost 200 years later.
Listen Now
For our friends in the Deaf and Signing community, you can view an ASL version of this episode HERE.
Episode Info
Episode Source Material
- Report of the Trial of Daniel M’Naghton archives
- The M’Naghten Rule
- M’Naghten Rule Definition
- 10 Uses of Insanity Defense
- M’Naghten Case
- R v. McNaughten M’Naghten Case Summary
- Timeline: British Prime Ministers
- The Old Bailey Archives: M/Naughten
- Merriam-Webster Dictionary : Insanity
- Cornel School of Law: The M’Naughten Rule
- A Case of Insanity: PBS Frontline WGCU
- California’s Insanity Defense The M’Naghten Rule
- America’s First M’Naghten Defense and the Origin of the Black Rage Syndrome
- Historical Society of the New York Courts People v. Freeman
- The Case of Daniel McNaughton: Let’s get the story straight, by John Thomas Dalby